Radiometric dating idiots site like gumtree dating
And this isn’t really an assumption as the decay rates have been tested in the laboratory for a hundred years or so, we have an example of a natural nuclear reactor where we can measure the various products and determine the decay rates (and the fine structure constant), and we can observe the past by looking deep into the past of the universe. The sigh isn’t for the effort of writing, it’s for the effort of finding all the references.The other is that the decay products of various atoms are always the same. Just looking at this list, I can see that none of these are actually assumptions used by radioactive dating methods and/or they are known issues and compensated for. Something that this particular website has none of. Basically, just like all creationists, they are making stuff up and then hoping you won’t check them on it. 1) atmosphere has always had the same amount of C-14 This is obviously in reference to carbon-14 dating of formerly living tissue.Yeah, it's a Gish Gallop, and a circlejerk as well: almost every reference link in the original article goes to creationist sources, usually on the same damn site. No scientific method can prove the age of the universe or the earth, and that includes the ones we have listed here.Although age indicators are called "clocks" they aren't, because all ages result from calculations that necessarily involve making assumptions about the past.” Well that generation did pass and none of the things Jesus said would happen, happened. No spin can undo the damage this passage does to the whole Jesus story.They did not see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power, etc. The other above quoted passages reinforce the message that the end times would occur within the lifetimes of Jesus generation.
You don’t even doubt today – even though the promises made by Jesus have not been fulfilled to this day.Jesus promises that, for anyone who has faith in his father, i.e.“the one who sent me”, prayers will be answered and the person praying will receive whatever he asks. The three were talking to each other, not shouting – note the verb used to describe the conversation; “saying”, “said unto Jesus”, “Jesus said”.Always the starting time of the "clock" has to be assumed as well as the way in which the speed of the clock has varied over time.Further, it has to be assumed that the clock was never disturbed. This is also the Nirvana fallacy, since it is discarding models based on their failing to provide absolute proof, regardless of how good the proof they provide is.